Log In Sign Up

iFR vs FFR DEFINE-FLAIR LAD Sub-Study

iFR vs FFR LAD sub-study of DEFINE-FLAIR explores the clinical outcomes of patients deferred from PCI using either index.

The study shows that the event rate in the LAD was significantly higher when using FFR compared to iFR (5.46% vs 2.44%, p=0.04) to defer revascularisation. No differences were seen in the Cx and RCA. These differences are likely to be explained by differences in flow as described by Dr Christopher Cook here http://bit.ly/iFRvsFFR-Flow.

Download the full JACC published manuscript http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/accj/73/4/444.full.pdf?download=true.
Videos open video

WONDR MEDICAL

Advantages of iFR pressure pullback in clinical decision-making

open video

WONDR MEDICAL

Comparing iFR pullback with other resting indices and the advantages of iFR...

open video

WONDR MEDICAL

iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub-Main findings of DEFINE-FLAIR

open video

WONDR MEDICAL

iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub-Safety of using iFR

open video

WONDR MEDICAL

iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub - Clinical outcome results

open video

WONDR MEDICAL

iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub-LAD, CX & RCA events

open video

WONDR MEDICAL

iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub - How to manage intermediate LAD lesions

open video

WONDR MEDICAL

iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub-Study - Aims of study

open video

WONDR MEDICAL

iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub-Study - Comparison with existing data

Speakers

Sayan Sen

A consultant cardiologist at Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, UK. Features in 91 videos on Wondr Medical. Sayan Sen generally speaks on Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), Live Cases, Instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR), Renal Denervation (RDN), and Catheter laboratory skills.

Follow

2020 All rights reserved