iFR vs FFR DEFINE-FLAIR LAD Sub-Study
The study shows that the event rate in the LAD was significantly higher when using FFR compared to iFR (5.46% vs 2.44%, p=0.04) to defer revascularisation. No differences were seen in the Cx and RCA. These differences are likely to be explained by differences in flow as described by Dr Christopher Cook here http://bit.ly/iFRvsFFR-Flow.
Download the full JACC published manuscript http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/accj/73/4/444.full.pdf?download=true.
WONDR MEDICAL
Advantages of iFR pressure pullback in clinical decision-making
WONDR MEDICAL
Comparing iFR pullback with other resting indices and the advantages of iFR...
WONDR MEDICAL
iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub-Main findings of DEFINE-FLAIR
WONDR MEDICAL
iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub-Safety of using iFR
WONDR MEDICAL
iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub - Clinical outcome results
WONDR MEDICAL
iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub-LAD, CX & RCA events
WONDR MEDICAL
iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub - How to manage intermediate LAD lesions
WONDR MEDICAL
iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub-Study - Aims of study
WONDR MEDICAL
iFR-LAD DEFINE-FLAIR Sub-Study - Comparison with existing data
Speakers
Sayan Sen
A consultant cardiologist at Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, UK. Features in 91 videos on Wondr Medical. Sayan Sen generally speaks on Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), Live Cases, Instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR), Renal Denervation (RDN), and Catheter laboratory skills.
2020 All rights reserved